The Wonderful Wizard of Aaz

Dorothy was a young orphaned girl raised by Uncle Sam and Aunt M from White Hall in the bleak landscape of a Kansas farm. She had a little dog called Toto, who was her sole source of happiness on the dry, orange prairies. One day, Dorothy and Toto were caught up in a cyclone inside their farmhouse which was deposited in a field in the eastern quadrant of the Land of Aaz.

The Good Witch of the North came to greet Dorothy and gave Dorothy  platinum Shoes (believed to have magical properties) that the Wicked Witch of the East had been wearing when she was accidentally killed by the falling farmhouse. In order to return to Kansas, the Good Witch of the North told  Dorothy that she would have to go to the Emerald Isle and ask the Wizard of Aaz to help her. Before she left, the Good Witch of the North kissed her on the forehead, giving her magical protection from trouble.

On her way down the Alliance  Yellow Brick Parade Road, Dorothy freed the Scarecrow from the Dairy City cleft stick he was hanging on, since he was annoying the Blackbirds merely because they were Black, restored the movements of the poor tired and rusted Tin Woodman with an oil can, and encouraged them and the Cowardly Lion to journey with her and Toto to the Emerald Isle.The Scarecrow wanted to get a brain, the Tin Woodman wanted a heart, and the Cowardly Lion wanted courage. All four of the travelers, as well as Uncle Sam and Aunt M, believed that the Wizard could solve their troubles. The party found many adventures on their journey together, including overcoming obstacles such as problems with poppies and the narrow sections of the Yellow Brick Road, which not everyone was allowed to go down in case they were attacked.

When the travelers arrived at the Emerald Isle, they were asked to wear green-tinted spectacles by the Guardian Secretary of the Gates of Hill Castle as long as they remained in the capital city. The four were the first to ever successfully meet with the Wizard. When each traveler met with the Wizard, he appeared each time as someone or something different. Dorothy saw the Wizard as a giant head, Scarecrow saw the Wizard as a beautiful woman called Kathleen Ni Houlihan, Tin Woodman saw the Wizard as a terrible beast, and the Cowardly Lion saw the Wizard as a ball of fire and energy. The Wizard agreed to help each of them this first time but when Dorothy and her friends met the Wizard of Aaz again, he tried to put them off. Toto accidentally tipped over a screen in a corner of the throne room at Hill Castle, revealing the Wizard to be an ordinary old man who had journeyed to Aaz from Omaha long ago in a hot air balloon. Ever since, the Wizard had longed to return to his home and work in a media circus again.

RICHARD HAAS, SPECIAL AGENT..............................

The Wizard provided the Scarecrow with a head full of bran, pins, and needles (“a lot of bran-new brains”), the Tin Woodman with a silk heart stuffed with sawdust, and the Cowardly Lion a potion of “courage”. Because of their faith in the Wizard’s assumed power, these otherwise useless items provided a focus for their desires. In order to help Dorothy and Toto get home, back down the Yellow Brick Road, the Wizard realized that he would have to take them home with him (as he had been growing tired of being cooped up all the time, and wanting to return to work in a media circus) in a new balloon of hot air, which he and Dorothy fashioned from green silk as Dorothy wanted everything to be green, since for her whole life she had been surrounded by orange. Even her hair was orange. Revealing himself to the people of the Emerald Isle one last time, the Wizard appointed the Scarecrow, by virtue of his brains, to rule the whole Emerald Isle in his stead, and impose Scarecrowish over the island. Dorothy chased Toto after he ran  after a kitten in the crowd, and before she could make it back to the balloon, the ropes broke leaving the Wizard to rise and float away alone.

But at Hill Castle, the travelers were greeted warmly by the Queen, and it was revealed  that Dorothy had the power to go home when she wanted all along. The platinum Shoes she wore could take her anywhere she wished to go. She tearfully embraced her friends, all of whom would be returned to their respective kingdoms: the Scarecrow to  Dairy City, the Tin Woodman to the East Country, and then on to Florida for a rest, and the Cowardly Lion to England, where he belonged. Having bid her friends farewell one final time, Dorothy knocked her heels together three times and wished to return home. When she opened her eyes, Dorothy and Toto had returned to Kansas to a joyful family reunion. For all his good work in exposing the Wizard of Aaz, Toto was elevated to the House of Dogs…. But everyone knew that nothing had really changed.

Disclaimer…Any resemblance of any of the fictional characters in this modern Fairy Tale to persons living or dead is completely unintentional ….At least I hope so….

Haass talks

Dorothy, the Wizard, Toto and the Munchkins?…..Surely not….The Scarecrow and Tin Woodman must have been meeting the Queen again in the Jail where they had once been detained at Her Pleasure, at the bottom of the Yellow Brick Road.   

Posted in Article | Comments Off on The Wonderful Wizard of Aaz

Belfast Central Library

Posted in Article | Comments Off on Belfast Central Library

Romancing Ireland : Richard Hayward: 2

When I first began to write books on Ulster history in the late 1960s, it was in an attempt to fill the obvious vacuum which existed in general public awareness concerning the real roots of the people of Northern Ireland. The increasing violence and depressing communal tragedy which continued over two decades and which I witnessed first hand as a Registrar in Child Health in the Ulster and City Hospitals and the Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children only highlighted the need to make available to Ulster’s divided community some very pertinent facts about their unseen, but very real, shared history and heritage. Little did I realise then that my own work would itself become part of the debate, gaining acceptance from all sections of the community, but at the same time coming under attack from those whose stereotyped views of Irish history were seriously disturbed by what was being revealed.

One of the main claims made against me was that I was “indulging in pure revisionism”. “Revisionism”, as the word implies, means to ‘revise’ one’s interpretation of history, though often the word is also used in a pejorative sense, implying that the revision is deliberately undertaken to help substantiate the revisionist’s own particular ‘slant’ on our past. When The Cruthin was published forty years ago in 1974, such a charge of revisionism might have seemed to contain some validity. After all, terms and concepts such as ‘the Cruthin people’, ‘the non-Celtic Irish’, ‘the Galloway connection’, – appeared at that time to be confined mostly to my own work. Indeed, Michael Hall’s summation of my writings in Ulster – the Hidden History must have seemed so unfamiliar to the reviewer in the Linen Hall Review, that the latter concluded that the historical thesis being expounded aimed “at nothing less than an overthrow of current perceptions”. 

To introduce something apparently so ‘new’ into the historical debate might, therefore, have served to confirm the ‘revisionist’ label. Yet before we come to such a conclusion, let us consider the following quotes: 

“In the north (of Ireland) the people were Cruithni, or Picts… If the (Uí Néill) failed to subdue the south thoroughly, they succeeded in crushing the Ultonians, and driving them ultimately into the south-eastern corner of the province. They plundered and burned Emain Macha, the ancient seat of the kings of the Ultonians, and made “sword land” of a large part of the kingdom… Consequent on the (Uí Néill) invasion of Ulster (was) an emigration of Irish Cruithin or Picts (to Scotland)… The men of the present Galloway were part of the tribe known in Ireland as Cruithni, that is Picts, and only differed from the Picts of (Scotland), in having come into Galloway from Ireland.” 

To readers aware of the present controversy these quotes might appear to be a reasonable précis of some of my own writings. In fact, I am not the author of the quotes: they have been taken from the ninth edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, published between 1876 and 1886 – over one hundred and thirty years ago. My father bought me this encyclopaedia from Claney’s Auction Rooms in Bangor when I was eight years old and I read it from cover to cover over the next few years. The Britannica’s historical interpretation was not an isolated one, however – many books of the period took a similar approach. With his deep interest in archaeology , Edward Carson orientated towards the Pictish origins of the British people, while, as an Ulster Scot, James Craig wrote about Dalriada…As a little boy my father had also bought for me The Pictish Nation, its people and its Church by Archibald B. Scott published in September 1918 by T. N. Foulis of Edinburgh and London, Boston, Australasia, Cape Colony and Toronto.  It was printed in Scotland by R & R Clarke Limited of Edinburgh.  The author dedicated his book to his father and mother and to the memory of his youngest brother who died, in 1916, of wounds inflicted in action and sleeps in France with other comrades of the 1st Cameron Highlanders. This wonderful book was my introduction to the Picts. 

Richard Hayward was my favourite author at this time, so that as my prize for being First in History in Bangor Grammar School Lower Fourth (First Form), at the age of twelve, I chose his In Praise of Ulster, first published by Arthur Barker of London in 1938 and illustrated by J. Humbert Craig. In this volume we read “ At the time of which we speak the four Southern kingdoms, including that of the Ardri were Celtic in character but it is not certain that the Ulster Kingdom was Celtic; it seems more likely that Ulster was made up of a more ancient Irish people than the Celts, who were comparative newcomers. They seem to have been known as the Cruithni, but we will call them the Ulstermen, for that is what they were, and it is highly probable that they were descended from the aboriginal pre-Celtic Irish people, with some possible connection to the old Pictish race. It is quite certain anyway that these Ulstermen considered themselves different from the Southern Irish even in that yesteryear, and in the face of present-day controversy it is piquant to think that they most likely looked upon themselves as the real Irish people and upon the Southern invaders as a motley crew of foreign Celtic interlopers!” Richard continued this theme in Ulster and the City of Belfast (1950) and Border Foray (1957) published by Arthur Barker, with  illustrations by my old friend Raymond Piper. 

While I have clarified and amended such historical interpretations, having taken into consideration more recent archæological and historical conclusions, the direction of my enquiry was in fundamentally the same vein. Yet in the second half of the 20th century there occurred a definite change in emphasis. The Irish somehow came to be considered as most definitely Celts, and references to pre-Celtic population groups such as the Cruthin were unaccountably deleted from most history publications. Even the present (dare I say ‘revised’) edition of the Britannica, in its section on Irish history, no longer makes mention of the Cruthin or even the ‘Galloway connection’. Indeed, when we look closely at much of the academic material brought out over this period, it would appear that extensive ‘revision’ has indeed taken place, a revision which played down these former pre-Celtic and British aspects. It is ironic, then, that if the charge of revisionism can be substantiated, it is not with relation to The Cruthin, but to what has been taking place since the middle of the last century among the urban elite, who have indulged in a process of selective historical awareness. Yet, when we come to look at what has been written by a few eminent academics in the past few years, a remarkable – and for some, no doubt, uncomfortable – about-face seems to be occurring. Increasingly, historical evaluation is returning to some of that earlier thinking, with many previous misinterpretations having been corrected, of course – and it is the more-recent history that has been found ‘wanting’. 

It has also been said that some Loyalists have tried to use my work in their efforts to justify a sectarian position, in the hope that it might give a new credibility to the idea of a ‘Protestant Ascendancy’, only this time in cultural terms – a ‘we were here first’ mentality. How a proper reading of my work could lead to the supposition that the descendants of the Cruthin are somehow now exclusively Ulster Protestants is hard to fathom. Actually many individuals within the Protestant section of the community, including the Dalaradia organisation, are showing great interest in the common identity theme I have promoted for so many years and are not only feeling a new confidence in their own identity, but have a desire to share this British Isles (Pretania) identity with the Catholic section of the community. In many ways a cultural battle is now on, in which interpretations of history are right to the forefront. It is a battle in which narrow and exclusive interpretations, which served to consolidate each section of the community’s supposed hegemony of righteousness, are under attack from a much broader and inclusive interpretation of all the facets which go to make up our identity. A positive outcome of this battle might just help to drag the  people of Northern Ireland away from their obsessions with distorted history and the divisive attitudes of the past.

Posted in Article | Comments Off on Romancing Ireland : Richard Hayward: 2

Constitutions and Culture Wars: Northern Ireland, the Irish State and the North-South Dimension

  

Monday, 16 June, 2014 John Hume Institute for Global Irish Studies, UCD 

9.00am Registration 

9.30am – 10.00am 

OPENING ADDRESS: TANAISTE AND MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE, MR EAMON GILMORE, TD 

10.00am – 11.30am 

Session 1: Public Opinion: The Continuing Salience of the South in the North?  

Chair: HE Mr Dominick Chilcott (British Embassy) 

Voting Behaviour under Consociational Conditions 

John Garry (Queens University Belfast) 

Fusing Protestantism with Pragmatism? The Membership of the Democratic Unionist Party 

Jon Tonge (University of Liverpool) 

11.30am – 12.00pm Tea/Coffee Break 

12.00pm – 1.30pm 

Session 2: Institutional Linkages and Networks 

Chair: Justice Catherine McGuinness 

North-South Institutions: Mainstreaming Gender Equality? 

Yvonne Galligan (Queens University Belfast) 

Different Pathways – Shared Interests: Women’s Activism in Ireland, North and South 

Melanie Hoewer (University College Dublin) 

1.30pm – 2.30pm Lunch Break 

2.30pm – 4.30pm 

Session 3: Constitutional and Cultural Divisions: Contextualising the Current Conjuncture  

Chair: Mr Gerry Moriarty (Irish Times) 

Adjusting to Partition: Nationalist Opinion and the Future of the Irish Border 

John Coakley (University College Dublin) 

Where are we? 

Brendan O’Leary (University of Pennsylvania) 

Modelling Conflict and Instability in Both Parts of (the Island of) Ireland 

Joseph Ruane (University College Cork / University College Dublin) 

4.30pm – 5.30pm 

Roundtable: North-South after the May 2014 Elections  

Roundtable participants/discussants: Niall O Dochartaigh (NUI Galway) and others TBC 

5.30pm Conference Close and Reception

 

Posted in Article | Comments Off on Constitutions and Culture Wars: Northern Ireland, the Irish State and the North-South Dimension

1912-1923: Reflecting on a Decade of War and Revolution in Ireland: 1914 – The Road to War – Universities Ireland

PROGRAMME

Saturday 14th June

Belfast City Hall

9.30 am Registration

10.00 am Official opening and introduction:Dr Michael Murphy, President University College Cork and Chair, Universities Ireland

Welcome: Lord Mayor of Belfast

10.30 am Chair: Professor Eunan O’Halpin, Professor of Contemporary Irish History, Trinity College Dublin

Keynote address: Professor Thomas Otte Professor of Diplomatic History, University of East Anglia – July 1914:Reflections on an Inadvertent war

11.15 am Refreshments

11.30 am Chair: Professor Peter Gray, Head of School of History and Anthropology, Queen’s University Belfast

Keynote Speaker: Professor Keith Jeffrey Professor of British History, Queen’s University Belfast- Reflections on Ireland and the First World War

12.15 pm Lunch – Reception Hall

1.30 pm Chair: Dr Fearghael Mc GarryReader in Modern Irish History, Queen’s University, Belfast 

First Panel Session: Digitised sources, archives and community research

Prof Richard Grayson, Head of History  (2011-14) and Professor of Twentieth Century

History, Goldsmiths, University of London

Mr Ian Montgomery, The Records Management,Cataloguing and Access Team (RMCAT), Public

Record Office of Northern Ireland. 

Ms Amanda Moreno, Head of Collections, Museums of The Royal Irish Regiment

2.30 pm Chair: Dr Conor Mulvagh, Lecturer in Irish History, UCD 

Second Panel Session: Ireland on the eve of the war 

Prof Richard Grayson, Head of History(2011-14) and Professor of Twentieth CenturyHistory, Goldsmiths, University of London – Social background of Dublin/Belfast volunteers

Dr Catriona Pennell, Senior Lecturer in History,University of Exeter – Ireland/UK at outbreak of war 

3.15 pm Refreshments

3.35 pm History Ireland Hedge School: Mr Tommy Graham, Editor, History Ireland

Dr Colin Reid, Senior Lecturer in History, Northumbria University, Newcastle – Irish Volunteers 

Dr Timothy Bowman, Senior Lecturer in History, University of Kent – Ulster Volunteers 

Dr Margaret Ward, Visiting Fellow in Irish History, Queens University Belfast – Pacifism and its development 

Dr Senia Paseta, Historian of Modern Ireland.University of Oxford – Women and war  

4.30pm Closing remarks: Dr Margaret O’Callaghan Senior Lecturer in Politics, Queen’s University Belfast 

Mr Robert Corbett,Records Manager, Belfast City Council will lead tours of the Rotunda area during refreshment and  lunch breaks. These tours will showcase the history of Belfast City Hall and its finest features. They are available on a first-come, first-served basis and will leave from the conference registration area outside the Great Hall.

Posted in Article | Comments Off on 1912-1923: Reflecting on a Decade of War and Revolution in Ireland: 1914 – The Road to War – Universities Ireland

Romancing Ireland- Richard Hayward: I

Richard Hayward (1892–1964) was my favourite writer when I was a little boy. He was also an actor and musician. Born in Southport, he was an enthusiast for all Ulster regional popular culture and I loved his books about Ulster and the rest of Ireland.

Among these are: In praise of Ulster (1938), Where the Shannon flows (1940), Corrib Country (1943), In the Kingdom of Kerry (1946), Leinster and the city of Dublin (1949),Belfast through the ages (1952), Story of the Irish Harp (1954) and Munster and the city of Cork (1964)

After a period working at the Gaiety Theatre Dublin he helped form the Belfast Repertory Theatre Company. He was a popular singer in the forties and fifties. His career meant he lived a typical theatrical lifestyle being constantly on the move. He died due to a road accident outside Ballymena, in October 1964.
 
Selected filmography
  • Richard also wrote the screenplay of the musical drama Devil’s Rock.

Posted in Article | Comments Off on Romancing Ireland- Richard Hayward: I

Visit of Tanaiste Eamon Gilmore to Belfast

Posted in Article | Comments Off on Visit of Tanaiste Eamon Gilmore to Belfast

Service of Thanksgiving for Sir John Gorman

Sir John Gorman, MC, a Catholic Unionist in Northern Ireland

Sir John Gorman, MC. Photo: VICTOR PATTERSON
 
This afternoon I attended the Service of Thanksgiving for Sir John at the beautiful St Mary’s Star of the Sea Church in Killyleagh, Co Down. The Service was conducted by The Very Revd. Eugene O’Neill and a beautiful Service and Requiem Mass it was. There was a host of his family, friends and colleagues present, from The Sovereign Military Order of Malta, of which he was a member and our own associated members and officers of The Commandery of Ards of the The Most Venerable Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem, to his military, civil and political associates. A Guard of Honour was held by his comrades in the Irish Guards.The eulogy was performed by his son Johnny Gorman G.M. As a collateral descendant of the polymath Sir Hans Sloane of Killyleagh through both my grannies I was pleased to be in Killyleagh to honour a descendant of the ancient British Brigantian tribe in Ireland.
   

Sir John Gorman, was a staunchly British Northern Irishman with an unflinching sense of service, which he demonstrated in winning the Irish Guards’ first Military Cross during a tank action in the Normandy campaign.

After the war he joined the Royal Ulster Constabulary before becoming a senior manager with British Overseas Airways Corporation, then head of the Northern Ireland Housing Executive. Finally he was elected to the Northern Ireland Assembly as the sole Roman Catholic member of the Ulster Unionist Party there, and served as Deputy Speaker until the Assembly’s suspension in 2002.

John Reginald Gorman was born on February 1 1923 at Mullaghmore House, Co Tyrone. Both sides of his family were Catholics and Unionists. His father, an RUC district inspector, had won an MC while serving in Palestine during the First World War and, as a member of the Royal Irish Constabulary, had handed over the Phoenix Park barracks to Michael Collins after the 1921 Anglo-Irish treaty — after which he moved north.

Having been educated by Loretto nuns at Omagh, John was sent to the Imperial Service College at Windsor. After war broke out in 1939 he attended Portrora Royal School, Enniskillen, which was then a firmly Anglican establishment and the Province’s leading public school. Despite the school’s religious ethos, Sir John never found his Catholicism a source of trouble or comment.

Commissioned into the Irish Guards in 1942, Sir John first experienced action as a tank commander during Operation Goodwood on July 18 1944.

At Cagny, five miles from Caen, Sir John’s troop was confronted by four enemy tanks, among them a King Tiger whose gun was aimed at one of their tanks. He had previously told his driver, Corporal James Baron, that if they were to encounter any of the feared Tigers, “The only thing we can do is to use naval tactics — if the 88mm gun is pointing away from us, we shall have to use the speed of the Sherman and ram it.”

The Sherman duly crashed through a hedge and careered down the slope at 40mph towards the King Tiger. With 75 yards to go before impact, the Sherman’s gunner, Guardsman Scholes, fired a high-explosive shell at the King Tiger, but it failed to penetrate the armour.

 

Sir John Gorman’s autobiography, published in 2002

The British tank struck the King Tiger hard on its right track, and both crews bailed out. The Sherman’s front gunner, Guardsman Agnew, mistakenly took refuge in a ditch with the German crew; on realising his error, he saluted smartly and disappeared into a cornfield to rejoin his comrades.

Having led his men to safety behind a hedge, Sir John raced 400 yards to leap into a lone Firefly tank, where one crew member had been decapitated and two others were in shock. The vehicle was still workable so, after removing the body and wiping the blood from the gun sights, Sir John fired its gun to disable the Tiger and his own tank, before driving behind three more Tigers to score two hits. He then carried three burning men from another Sherman to an aid post.

For this action, Sir John was recommended for an Immediate MC and Baron for a Military Medal. Both men were presented with their medals in the field by General Montgomery.

Outside Brussels the regiment was greeted by jubilant crowds, and an elderly woman presented Gorman with a copy of Some Experiences of an Irish RM, which had been left at her parents’ house by another Irish Guardsman in 1914. But the war was not yet over, and Sir John, by now a captain, attended the briefing on the impending Arnhem campaign given by Lieutenant-General Sir Brian Horrocks, the Corps Commander. When Horrocks announced that the “honour of leading this great dash which may end the war” would be given to the Irish Guards, Sir John expostulated: “Oh, my God, not again!” Sir John and his troop crossed the Nijmegen bridge before the advance was called off. 

Sir John Gorman playing a fife (BELFAST TELEGRAPH)

Having left the Army in the rank of captain in 1946, Sir John joined the RUC and became a district inspector in Antrim. There, in 1947, he came into conflict with the young Ian Paisley, who had objected to a proposed Roman Catholic pilgrimage to a holy well at Rasharkin. Gorman gave the procession an RUC guard on the Feast of the Assumption.

In 1955 he was moved, as district inspector, to Armagh where, shortly after his arrival, he and an Army officer, Major Brian Clark, helped to disarm a young fusilier who had gone berserk.Sir John suggested to Clark that their exploit was worth a medal — but only one. They tossed a coin for the honour and in due course Clark, on Sir John’s recommendation, was awarded the George Medal. Later, with the approval of the Archbishop of Armagh, Cardinal D’Alton, Sir John uncovered an IRA bomb-making factory in the Catholic Cathedral, which led to the arrest of three armed gunmen hiding in the confessionals.

During the IRA’s border campaign in the 1950s Sir John acted as a liaison officer with MI5 and MI6, and in 1960 his security contacts put his name forward for the position of chief of security at BOAC. One of his first duties was to supervise the security arrangements for the royal tour of Pakistan, Nepal and Iran in 1961, at the end of which he was appointed CVO. He was later promoted the airline’s head of personnel, with a seat on the board. In 1968 he moved to become the airline’s manager in Canada, and, from 1975, in India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.

In 1979 Sir John returned to his native province to become deputy chairman and chief executive of the Northern Ireland Housing Executive, the country’s largest owner of public housing. He succeeded in cleaning up corruption and selling off council houses, and in 1986 became part-time director of the Institute of Directors in Northern Ireland, an office he held until 1995.

In 1990 he aroused controversy when he invited the Irish Taoiseach, Charles Haughey, to address an IoD meeting in Belfast, in Haughey’s capacity as President of the European Union. Prominent among opponents of the visit was the Unionist politician David Trimble. None the less, after David’s election as Ulster Unionist leader in 1995, Sir John joined the UUP, and in 1996 was nominated by his party as a member of the Northern Ireland Forum for Political Dialogue, a body which had been set up in parallel with inter-party talks. He was subsequently chairman of the Forum, a position which he held until its last session in April 1998.

Following the Belfast Agreement of the same year, Sir John was elected as member for North Down in the new Northern Ireland Assembly, and served as a Deputy Speaker of the assembly from 2000 until its suspension in 2002. As the lone Roman Catholic in the Ulster Unionist Group at Stormont, Sir John, with his neat military moustache, cut a somewhat idiosyncratic figure (his opponents called him “Captain Mainwaring”). On one occasion television viewers in Northern Ireland were entertained by the astonishing spectacle of him urging the bemused Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness to blow up IRA arms in “one big bang”.

In 2002 he published an autobiography, The Times of My Life.

John Gorman was appointed MBE in 1959, CBE in 1974 and was knighted in 1998. In 2005 he was appointed a Chevalier of the Légion d’honneur. He married, in 1948, Heather Caruth, who survives him with two daughters and a son. Another son predeceased him.

 

Sir John Gorman, born February 1 1923, died May 26 2014

Posted in Article | Comments Off on Service of Thanksgiving for Sir John Gorman

The Declaration of Arbroath

 

The ‘Tyninghame’ copy of the Declaration from 1320 AD

Alongside the battles and bloodshed of the Scottish “Wars of Independence” in north Britain there was also a diplomatic struggle – a war of words and propaganda. The two Norman warlords the “Scottish” Robert the Bruce and the “English” Edward II vied for the support of the Pope, who supported Edward’s feudal Lordship over the Norman Barons in Scotland.

On 10 February 1306 Robert the Bruce and John the Red Comyn, lord of Badenoch, met at Greyfriars Kirk in Dumfries, resulting in the murder of Comyn by Bruce.The subjugation of Buchan which then took place in 1308 saw vast areas of Buchan in northeast Scotland, then ruled by Clan Comyn, burned to the ground by Bruce and his ruthless brother Edward, immediately following their May 1308 success at the Battle of Barra.

After his defeat at Barra, John Comyn, Earl of Buchan fled to England. Bruce’s men chased him as far as Turrif, a distance of sixteen miles (25 km). Before heading south to lay siege to Aberdeen Castle, the Bruces “destroyed by fire his whole Earldom”, including all the castles and strongholds, principally Rattray Castle and Dunarg Castle.

Bruce’s men then proceeded to kill those loyal to the Comyns, men, women and children, in an orgy of ethnic cleansing, which was to haunt Bruce on his deathbed, destroying their homes, farms, crops and slaughtering their cattle. Terrorising the locals, Bruce prevented any possible chance of future hostility towards him and his men. The Comyns had ruled Buchan for nearly a century, from 1214, when William Comyn inherited the title from his wife. Such was the terror and destruction, however, that the people of Buchan lost all loyalties to the Comyns and never again rose against Bruce’s supporters.

The Pope was a powerful figure in medieval times. Bruce’s killing of Comyn (Cummings) on holy ground at Greyfriars Kirk led to his excommunication. The Pope had turned his back on Bruce – so that in 1318 Bruce, his lieutenants and his bishops were all excommunicated.

Bruce reacted by having three letters sent to the Pope. The first was a letter from the bold Robert, the second from the Scots clergy, and the third from the nobles of Scotland. The third letter became known as the “Declaration of Arbroath” and survives to this day, being used by modern Scottish Nationalists for political purposes.

In this letter, the Scots, who claimed descent from Irish invader warlords, vaunted their expulsion of the native Britons and their utter destruction of the Picts, neither of which they were actually able to achieve, for we are the descendants of these ancient peoples. Their claim of one hundred and thirty Kings is pure fabrication and most of the second paragraph is nonsense.

This translation of the original Latin was compiled by Alan Borthwick in June 2005

To the most Holy Father and Lord in Christ, the Lord John, by divine providence Supreme Pontiff of the Holy Roman and Universal Church, his humble and devout sons Duncan, Earl of Fife, Thomas Randolph, Earl of Moray, Lord of Man and of Annandale, Patrick Dunbar, Earl of March, Malise, Earl of Strathearn, Malcolm, Earl of Lennox, William, Earl of Ross, Magnus, Earl of Caithness and Orkney, and William, Earl of Sutherland; Walter, Steward of Scotland, William Soules, Butler of Scotland, James, Lord of Douglas, Roger Mowbray, David, Lord of Brechin, David Graham, Ingram Umfraville, John Menteith, guardian of the earldom of Menteith, Alexander Fraser, Gilbert Hay, Constable of Scotland, Robert Keith, Marischal of Scotland, Henry Sinclair, John Graham, David Lindsay, William Oliphant, Patrick Graham, John Fenton, William Abernethy, David Wemyss, William Mushet, Fergus of Ardrossan, Eustace Maxwell, William Ramsay, William Mowat, Alan Murray, Donald Campbell, John Cameron, Reginald Cheyne, Alexander Seton, Andrew Leslie and Alexander Straiton, and the other barons and freeholders and the whole community of the realm of Scotland send all manner of filial reverence, with devout kisses of his blessed feet.

Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today. The Britons they first drove out, the Picts they utterly destroyed, and, even though very often assailed by the Norwegians, the Danes and the English, they took possession of that home with many victories and untold efforts; and, as the historians of old time bear witness, they have held it free of all bondage ever since. In their kingdom there have reigned one hundred and thirteen kings of their own royal stock, the line unbroken a single foreigner. The high qualities and deserts of these people, were they not otherwise manifest, gain glory enough from this: that the King of kings and Lord of lords, our Lord Jesus Christ, after His Passion and Resurrection, called them, even though settled in the uttermost parts of the earth, almost the first to His most holy faith. Nor would He have them confirmed in that faith by merely anyone but by the first of His Apostles — by calling, though second or third in rank — the most gentle Saint Andrew, the Blessed Peter’s brother, and desired him to keep them under his protection as their patron forever.

The Most Holy Fathers your predecessors gave careful heed to these things and bestowed many favours and numerous privileges on this same kingdom and people, as being the special charge of the Blessed Peter’s brother. Thus our nation under their protection did indeed live in freedom and peace up to the time when that mighty prince the King of the English, Edward, the father of the one who reigns today, when our kingdom had no head and our people harboured no malice or treachery and were then unused to wars or invasions, came in the guise of a friend and ally to harass them as an enemy. The deeds of cruelty, massacre, violence, pillage, arson, imprisoning prelates, burning down monasteries, robbing and killing monks and nuns, and yet other outrages without number which he committed against our people, sparing neither age nor sex, religion nor rank, no one could describe nor fully imagine unless he had seen them with his own eyes.

But from these countless evils we have been set free, by the help of Him Who though He afflicts yet heals and restores, by our most tireless Prince, King and Lord, the Lord Robert. He, that his people and his heritage might be delivered out of the hands of our enemies, met toil and fatigue, hunger and peril, like another Macabaeus or Joshua and bore them cheerfully. Him, too, divine providence, his right of succession according to or laws and customs which we shall maintain to the death, and the due consent and assent of us all have made our Prince and King. To him, as to the man by whom salvation has been wrought unto our people, we are bound both by law and by his merits that our freedom may be still maintained, and by him, come what may, we mean to stand. Yet if he should give up what he has begun, and agree to make us or our kingdom subject to the King of England or the English, we should exert ourselves at once to drive him out as our enemy and a subverter of his own rights and ours, and make some other man who was well able to defend us our King; for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom — for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.

Therefore it is, Reverend Father and Lord, that we beseech your Holiness with our most earnest prayers and suppliant hearts, inasmuch as you will in your sincerity and goodness consider all this, that, since with Him Whose vice-gerent on earth you are there is neither weighing nor distinction of Jew and Greek, Scotsman or Englishman, you will look with the eyes of a father on the troubles and privation brought by the English upon us and upon the Church of God. May it please you to admonish and exhort the King of the English, who ought to be satisfied with what belongs to him since England used once to be enough for seven kings or more, to leave us Scots in peace, who live in this poor little Scotland, beyond which there is no dwelling-place at all, and covet nothing but our own. We are sincerely willing to do anything for him, having regard to our condition, that we can, to win peace for ourselves. This truly concerns you, Holy Father, since you see the savagery of the heathen raging against the Christians, as the sins of Christians have indeed deserved, and the frontiers of Christendom being pressed inward every day; and how much it will tarnish your Holiness’s memory if (which God forbid) the Church suffers eclipse or scandal in any branch of it during your time, you must perceive. Then rouse the Christian princes who for false reasons pretend that they cannot go to help of the Holy Land because of wars they have on hand with their neighbours. The real reason that prevents them is that in making war on their smaller neighbours they find quicker profit and weaker resistance. But how cheerfully our Lord the King and we too would go there if the King of the English would leave us in peace, He from Whom nothing is hidden well knows; and we profess and declare it to you as the Vicar of Christ and to all Christendom. But if your Holiness puts too much faith in the tales the English tell and will not give sincere belief to all this, nor refrain from favouring them to our prejudice, then the slaughter of bodies, the perdition of souls, and all the other misfortunes that will follow, inflicted by them on us and by us on them, will, we believe, be surely laid by the Most High to your charge.

To conclude, we are and shall ever be, as far as duty calls us, ready to do your will in all things, as obedient sons to you as His Vicar; and to Him as the Supreme King and Judge we commit the maintenance of our cause, casting our cares upon Him and firmly trusting that He will inspire us with courage and bring our enemies to nought. May the Most High preserve you to his Holy Church in holiness and health and grant you length of days.

Given at the monastery of Arbroath in Scotland on the sixth day of the month of April in the year of grace thirteen hundred and twenty and the fifteenth year of the reign of our King aforesaid.

 

Posted in Article | Comments Off on The Declaration of Arbroath

Soldiers of Gloucestershire Museum gets Royal seal of approval

Soldiers of Gloucestershire Museum gets Royal seal of approval

By The Citizen  |  Posted: May 30, 2014

By Matt Discombe

  • The Duke of Gloucester
  • Attendees at Soldiers of Gloucestershire Museum’s official opening
  • Drum display

A Royal seal of approval was given to the Soldiers of Gloucestershire Museum on Friday evening for it’s official relaunch.

The Duke and Duchess of Gloucester had a tour of the revamped museum and officially reopened it in front of assembled veterans and currently serving military personnel.

It has taken five and half months to refurbish the museum which now has a refreshed layout, new artefacts and and interactive educational displays.

In his speech, Prince Richard, the Duke of Gloucester and cousin to The Queen said: “It’s a great pleasure to see the museum refurbished and in a very central position in the Docks to remind the local community what their predecessors and ancestors achieved.

“It’s important to have a sense of history and know what people did and what they sacrificed. We have many reasons to be thankful to the soldiers of Gloucestershire.”

A £500,000 grant from the Heritage Lottery Fund funded the revamp, which saw the museum completely stripped out last November.

The museum now aims to give visitors a timeline through Gloucestershire’s involvement in the First World War through interactive educational tools and refreshed displays.

Lavinia Drake, manager of the Soldiers of Gloucestershire Museum, said: “The museum is a million times better than it was and with it’s fresh look we can appeal to a wider audience.

“The museum aims to appeal to three types of visitor. Firstly to the people who want to bowser and spend half an hour here, secondly to visitors who are more interested and will look around for an hour, and thirdly to people who are seriously into their military history who can spend hours here.”

Gloucester Mayor Chris Chatterton, City Council Leader Paul James and Gloucester MP Richard Graham were on hand to meet the Royal couple before their tour.

Also in attendance were representatives from The Rifles, the Royal Wessex Yeomanry, and Gloucester cadets.

Gloucester Mayor Chris Chatterton, who has been a trustee of the museum since November, said: “Gloucestershire’s military history is something that everyone should know about. It’s important to remember the incredible contribution made by Gloucestershire in the First World War.

“These new displays give visitors a very clear timeline of what happened not just with the development of the regiment but with the development of the country.”

Richard Graham MP said: “This is a celebration of the regeneration of Gloucestershire’s military heritage. It’s important to celebrate the regiments and bring together people from around the county and hopefully share the museum with visitors too.”

Read more: http://www.gloucestercitizen.co.uk/Soldiers-Gloucestershire-Museum-gets-Royal-seal/story-21166800-detail/story.html#ixzz33qg9jfJx

Posted in Article | Comments Off on Soldiers of Gloucestershire Museum gets Royal seal of approval