The Gospels (Good News): Part 1

The story of the Gospels  begins on a low hill, just outside the city of Jerusalem, about 30 AD, in the early days of the Roman Empire. This hill was popularly known as Golgotha, which is to say, “The place of the skull;” but many now call it Calvary. Here was crucified Jesus of Nazareth, “the King of the Jews”. 

 According to the Gospel of Mark:
“And they gave Him to drink wine mingled with myrrh, but He received it not.
And when they had crucified Him, they parted His garments, casting lots upon them, what every man should take.
And it was the third hour, and they crucified Him.
And the superscription of His accusation was written over, THE KING OF THE JEWS.
And when the sixth hour was come, there was darkness over the whole land until the ninth hour.
And at the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani? Which is, being interpreted, My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me?
And some of them that stood by, when they heard it said, Behold, He calleth Elias.
And one ran and filled a sponge full of vinegar, and put it on a reed, and gave Him to drink, saying, Let alone; let us see whether Elias will come to take Him down.
And Jesus cried with a loud voice and gave up the ghost.
And the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom.
And when the centurion, which stood over against Him, saw that He so cried out, and gave up the ghost, he said Truly this man was the Son of God.” 

The Gospel of Mark may well be the first to have been written, by John Mark, the personal secretary of the apostle Peter. The version we have now was certainly composed 35 to 40 years after the events Mark recorded by a well–educated Greek-Speaking Christian. The term Gospel means “Good News” and the author was concerned with how he was bringing such news to the people rather than writing an actual biography of Jesus.

In this Gospel, Jesus is described as “the Christ, the Son of God” (1:1). For most Jewish people at the time this would have been a remarkable statement and to the educated élite would have appeared quite shocking. For “Christ” is Greek for the “Anointed One”, and is the equivalent of the Hebrew term for “Messiah”. The Jews were awaiting a great military leader or Cosmic figure who would deliver them from their enemies, not a person who had just suffered and in their eyes died ignobly on Calvary. And yet that is precisely why the author says… He was the Messiah….And so he was….

One of the significant points about the account is that at the beginning nobody actually seems to have known he was the Messiah. His family didn’t seem to know. The neighbours from his virtually unknown little village of Nazareth wondered what this son of the local carpenter was talking about… But, most of all, his Disciples didn’t seem to know who he was. God, of course, knew who he was, because Jesus, at his baptism by John the Baptist, and only Jesus, heard a voice from heaven declaring” you are my beloved son” (1:11)…. Mary Magdelene knew…. And the demons he cast out knew….But no one else had a clue.

All this changes in the middle of the Gospel, with the metaphor of the blind man who gradually regains his sight. The disciples at last begin to understand, though Jesus instructs them not to tell anyone. And he continues to predict that he must suffer and die, to take away the sins of the World. Yet, at the very end, even Jesus himself seems not to be so sure after all. He prays to God three times to save him from his fate , and then cries out in total despair before he dies, literally of a broken heart. He had suffered extreme torture and mental anquish, so that his heart finally ruptured, as the description of his death authentically shows. He was totally, absolutely, completely dead.

Yet if anyone had doubts about what had happened next, the author does not. Jesus’s death and resurrection had inevitably to be such, and, in fact, we, his readers, are expected to take up their own crosses and follow the Master….

Posted in Article | Comments Off on The Gospels (Good News): Part 1

Revolutionary Tours

The continuing burden of Gaelic Pseudohistory…. 

Historian Prof Diarmaid Ferriter has questioned the decision to invite members of the British royal family to the Easter Rising commemorations in 2016.He said the decision was taken without consulting the expert advisory group on the centenary which includes himself and other prominent historians such as Martin Manrsergh and Prof Eunan O’Halpin of Trinity College Dublin .

Prof Ferriter, professor of modern history at University College Dublin (UCD), said the emphasis on the good relations between “Britain and Ireland” had led to a “noble aspiration to please everybody and include everybody, which will not do justice to the historic divisions that were there that we need to understand”.
Complicated
“Allegiances and loyalties that existed in Ireland 100 years ago were very complicated and multi-layered,” he said. “I’m worried that we are heading towards something that is full of holes as to the historical reality at the time.”

He is concerned that the presence of the British royal family will end up “distorting history quite significantly”.

The decision to invite the royal family was first mooted in September by the Tánaiste Eamon Gilmore. It would appear to have been confirmed by The Queen in her speech in Windsor Castle last week when she said: “My family and my government will stand alongside you, Mr President, and your ministers, throughout the anniversaries of the war and of the events that led to the creation of the Irish Free State.”
No consultation
The decision to invite a royal family member was taken without consulting the expert advisory group which meets every six to eight weeks. “The State can make this invitation, but what are we there for if we are not going to be asked for advice on big decisions like that?” Prof Ferriter said.

“The State doesn’t own the legacy of 1916. Nobody does except the people. We are trying to organise public consultations to get people’s views.”

He believed the presence of the royal family might give succour to those who believed the Rising was unnecessary, as the British government had committed to the introduction of home rule once the war was over. “I’m on the side of evidence. There was no evidence that Britain was prepared to settle its Irish question until it was forced to do it. We don’t need to abandon our critical faculties because of the warm haze after the Queen’s visit.”

Posted in Article | Comments Off on Revolutionary Tours

3753 Cruithne: the Cruthin Planetoid

Jesse Smith's photo.
Courtesy of Jesse Smith
 
3753 Cruithne is an asteroid in a horseshoe orbit around the Sun in 1:1 orbital resonance with the Earth. It is a periodic inclusion planetoid and has been incorrectly called “Earth’s second moon”, but it is a quasi-satellite, not a moon. Cruithne does not orbit Earth, and at times it is on the other side of the Sun. Its orbit takes it inwards towards the orbit of Mercury, and outside the orbit of Mars.Cruithne orbits the Sun in about 1 year, but it takes 770 years for the series to complete a horseshoe-shaped movement, with the Earth in the gap of the horseshoe.

Cruithne was discovered on October 10, 1986, by Duncan Waldron on a photographic plate taken with the UK Schmidt Telescope at Siding Spring Observatory, Coonabarabran, Australia. The 1983 apparition (1983 UH) is credited to Giovanni de Sanctis and Richard M. West of the European Southern Observatory in Chile. It was not until 1997 that its unusual orbit was determined by Paul Wiegart and Kimmo Innanen, working at York University in Toronto, and Seppo MIKKOLA, working at the University of Turku in Finland.

The asteroid is named after the Cruithne or Cruthin, the people of early medieval Ireland mentioned in the Annals of Ulster. They are the ancient Pretani, from whom Britain gets its name and are the subject of my first book of that name Cruthin-The Ancient Kindred. In Great Britain, or Alba, they were known as Picts.

Cruithne and Earth seem to follow each other because of a 1:1 orbital resonance.

Cruithne appears to make a bean-shaped orbit from the perspective of Earth.
 
 Cruithne is approximately 5 kilometres (3.1 mi) in diameter, and its closest approach to Earth is approximately thirty times the separation between Earth and the Moon (12 Gm or twelve million kilometres). From 1994 through 2015, Cruithne makes its annual closest approach to Earth every November. Although Cruithne’s orbit is not thought to be stable over the long term, calculations by Wiegert and Innanen showed that it has probably been synchronized with Earth’s orbit for a long time. There is no danger of a collision with Earth for millions of years, if ever. Its orbital path and Earth’s do not cross, and its orbital plane is currently tilted to that of the Earth by 19.8°. Cruithne, having a maximum near-Earth magnitude of +15.8, is fainter than Pluto and would require at least a 12.5-inch (320 mm) reflecting telescope to be seen.

Cruithne is in a normal elliptic orbit around the Sun. Its period of revolution around the Sun, approximately 364 days at present, is almost equal to that of the Earth. Because of this, Cruithne and Earth appear to “follow” each other in their paths around the Sun. This is why Cruithne is sometimes called “Earth’s second moon”. However, it does not orbit the Earth and is not a moon. In 2058, Cruithne will come within 0.09 AU (13.6 million kilometres) of Mars. Due to a high orbital eccentricity, Cruithne’s distance from the Sun and orbital speed vary a lot more than the Earth’s, so from the Earth’s point of view Cruithne actually follows a kidney bean-shaped horseshoe orbit ahead of the Earth, taking slightly less than one year to complete a circuit of the “bean”. Because it takes slightly less than a year, the Earth “falls behind” the bean a little more each year, and so from our point of view, the circuit is not quite closed, but rather like a spiral loop that moves slowly away from the Earth.

After many years, the Earth will have fallen so far behind that Cruithne will then actually be “catching up” on the Earth from “behind”. When it eventually does catch up, Cruithne will make a series of annual close approaches to the Earth; this will alter Cruithne’s orbit by a little over half a million kilometres—while Earth’s orbit is altered by about 1.3 centimetres (0.51 in)—so that its period of revolution around the Sun will then become slightly more than a year. The kidney bean will then start to migrate away from the Earth again in the opposite direction – instead of the Earth “falling behind” the bean, the Earth is “pulling away from” the bean. The next such series of close approaches will be centred on the year 2292 – in July of that year, Cruithne will approach Earth to about 12,500,000 kilometres (7,800,000 mi).

After 380 to 390 years or so, the kidney-bean-shaped orbit approaches Earth again from the other side, and the Earth, once more, alters the orbit of Cruithne so that its period of revolution around the Sun is again slightly less than a year (this last happened with a series of close approaches centred on 1902, and will next happen with a series centered on 2676). The pattern then repeats itself.

Cruithne plays a major role in Steven Baxter’s novel Manifold: Time, which was nominated for the Arthur C. Clarke science fiction award in 2000.

Posted in Article | Comments Off on 3753 Cruithne: the Cruthin Planetoid

The Methuselah Star

The Star Older than the Universe?

 Astronomers have discovered a star, in our own galaxy, which appears to be older than the present accepted age of the universe. Odd? In actual fact, it is, of course, impossible, unless our ideas of how the universe formed are totally wrong. So what have we got wrong: the age of the star, or the age of the universe? 

   Well it’s not quite as simple as that. There is an error margin for the estimate of the age of the star, and the lower end of that margin puts the star just within the estimated edge for the universe. The mysterious ‘Methuselah Star’ appears to be between 14 and 15 billion years old, while the universe itself is thought to have come into existence 13.7 billion years ago. But it’s still a major mystery how a star can be that old. And the chances of one of the earliest stars in the history of the universe just happening to be so close to the Sun at this time are also rather remote. At magnitude 7.2, it’s easily visible even in binoculars, in Libra. See below for its position. 

    And even after using new information about the star’s distance from us, its brightness and its structure, scientists are unable to place an estimate of its age much below 14.5 billion years – still older than the universe. 

   Fortunately for the team from Pennsylvania State University and the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, there appears to be a margin of error of about 800 million years, or so – enough to just barely place the star below the age of everything else. 

   Known as HD 140283, or TYC 5601-694-1, the star is the oldest object currently known to astronomers. It was first discovered a century ago, moving more than 800,000 mph relative to the Sun. It is on a long and looping orbit around the galaxy, and is only briefly passing through our neighbourhood. 

    In the study published in Astrophysical Journal Letters, astronomers said the star was born in a ‘dwarf galaxy’ which was swallowed by the Milky Way more than 12 billion years ago. Using new measurements the team was able to refine its estimate of the star’s position, and learn more about its structure. 

   The study suggests that further research might bring the age of the star down even further. See:

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/03/08/astronomers-find-ancient-star-methuselah_n_2834999.html

 – from the newssheet of the Irish Astronomical Association, written by Terry Moseley 

Posted in Article | Comments Off on The Methuselah Star

‘Ceiliúradh’ (Celebration): Royal Albert Hall, London

Windsor 2

On the occasion of the State Visit by the President of Ireland Michael D. Higgins and Sabina Higgins 

In the presence of Their Royal Highnesses Prince and Princess Michael of Kent  

 

the Ambassador of Ireland Daniel Mulhall and Greta Mulhall

request the pleasure of the company of

 

Dr Ian Adamson OBE 

at
 

Ceiliúradh’ (Celebration)

an evening of music, spoken word and dance at the Royal Albert Hall, London
on Thursday 10th April, 2014 from 8:30pm- 10pm
 
 Email: danielle.lewis@dfa.ie  Tel: 0207 201 2513
Embassy of Ireland, 17 Grosvenor Place, London SW1X 7HR
 
Please note, this is not an official ticket. Upon your acceptance, official ticket(s) from the Royal Albert Hall will be posted to you by the Embassy of Ireland
 
Important Information:
Please confirm your postal address when you RSVP. We hope you will understand that tickets for this special event are limited.
We must release these tickets to another guest if you do not confirm your attendance before 5 March.
 
Unfortunately, the Embassy will be unable to allocate any additional tickets to invited guests.  However, a limited number of tickets (£10, including booking fees) will be available from the Royal Albert Hall Box Office from 9am on Friday 28 February.  Proceeds from ticket sales will be donated to the Irish Youth Foundation (UK) to be used in support of Irish cultural projects in Britain.
 
Please note, guests will be asked to take their seats at 8pm. Further information on security arrangements for this event will follow.
Dress code: Lounge Suit
 
 

The state visit by Irish President Michael D. Higgins to Britain this week – the first ever by an Irish head of state – is being seen as an historic landmark in relationships.President Higgins and his wife, Sabina, were formally greeted by Queen Elizabeth and the Duke of Edinburgh on Tuesday and were driven by horse drawn carriage to Windsor Castle for a ceremonial welcome. The visit reached a crescendo tonight with ‘Ceiliúradh’. Helen Brooker and I attended this event. We were invited as Chair of the Ullans Academy and the Somme Association respectively,  by the  Irish Ambassador in London, on behalf of Michael D Higgins. I think this was a great honour for us to represent the Ullans Academy and recognition of the work put into our events.  Helen has worked hard for the  Academy, as well as helping me restore my original Pretani business, so it will be a fitting finale for her as Chair.

 

President Higgins hails ‘memorable’ State visit 

'Ceiliúradh, meaning celebration, is an evening of song, dance and spoken word 
 
 
Around half of the 5,000 tickets for the event sold out in four hours when they went on sale

 President Michael D Higgins has hailed his “memorable” historic State visit to the UK as “so positive, so uplifting and so hopeful”. He took to the Royal Albert Hall stage after the concert in his honour and said: “On a night like this it is great to be Irish.” He added it was “even better” to share it with “our friends in Britain”. President Higgins was guest of honour at the concert on the penultimate day of the State visit.

The President and his wife, Sabina, were joined by Prince and Princess Michael of Kent for the concert .

Among the performers were Imelda May, Paul Brady, Glen Hansard and The Gloaming. Also taking part was actress Fiona Shaw, broadcasters Dermot O’Leary and Olivia O’Leary, and author Joseph O’Connor.

Around half of the 5,000 tickets for the event, priced at £10, sold out in four hours when they went on sale.

Other attendees were invited guests, including political, business, cultural and Irish community contacts.

Proceeds from the ticket sales are being donated to the Irish Youth Foundation, to be used in support of Irish cultural projects in Britain. In his speech, President Higgins thanked the Irish people who had made Britain their home and contributed to its development. He said that the performances at the concert show “how deeply interwoven are the wider cultures of these islands, and how they have influenced and enriched each other.” Speaking to the diaspora, he said: “You remain a cherished member of the Irish family.” The four-day State visit comes to an end tomorrow.

 
Posted in Article | Comments Off on ‘Ceiliúradh’ (Celebration): Royal Albert Hall, London

Launch of ‘Thon Ulster Scots book ’

Liam Logan’s “Thon Ulster Scots Book” is a humorous look at Ulster-Scots and Ulster Scots speakers.

Liam Logan is an Ulster Scots enthusiast and commentator a former Chair of the Ulster-Scots(Ullans) Academy and present Trustee of the Somme Association, who has made a massive contribution to the recent interest in the language as a native speaker, broadcaster, journalist and writer.

Originally a native of Dunloy, Co Antrim, Liam has presented Radio Ulster’s main Ulster Scots programme, “A Kist of Words” for over ten years and as front man for the television series “Santer” as well as being involved with a number of national television projects for the BBC and TG4 about Ulster Scots. 

Liam believes that “Ulster Scots and Irish have a significant role to play in bringing communities together and play a very important part of our shared heritage. Ulster Scots (Ullans) is the link between Irish Gaelic (Gaeilge), Scottish Gaelic (Gàidhlig), Scots (Scotch) and English and he feels that these links should be strengthened and further developed.”

James Fenton, author of The Hamely Tongue, has said “Liam Logan’s ‘Thon Ulster Scots Book’ is a wide-ranging, comprehensive and authentic guide to the rich figurative speech of that part of County Antrim the author has called “the Hame o the Hamely Tongue”.

Dr Ian Adamson OBE, former Lord Mayor of Belfast as said “If you do not read another book on Ulster-Scots, be sure you read this one”. 

The book extensively features the photography of Boyd McClurg, illustrations by Stephen Shaw and paintings by the Treasure Each Voice project. The cover was photographed by Mervyn Keys, a Broughshane man and features the so-called “super moon” over Slemish. 

 

Liam Logan’s ‘Thon Ulster Scots Book’ was launched in Northern Ireland this evening at the Linenhall Library, Belfast, under the auspices of the MAGUS (Ulster-Scots Academy) and will be further launched in the Republic of Ireland on Friday April 4th at 8pm in Kee’s Hotel, Stranorlar. A second launch in the Republic will take place on Saturday April 5th April at 2pm in The Book Centre, Ballybofey. Co Donegal.

Posted in Article | Comments Off on Launch of ‘Thon Ulster Scots book ’

World War One memorial ceremony in Dublin

Theresa Villiers visits Dublin for WW1 memorial event

 

Theresa Villiers and Irish Arts Minister Jimmy Deenihan unveiled the memorial
Theresa Villiers and Irish Arts Minister Jimmy Deenihan unveiled the memorial
 

I attended this event as  chairman of the Somme Association and a member of the Northern Ireland World War I Centenary committee chaired by Rt Hon Jeffrey Donaldson MP.

Northern Ireland Secretary Theresa Villiers has described as a “great honour” her attendance at the ceremony

She laid a foundation stone for a memorial cross at Glasnevin Cemetery with Irish Arts Minister Jimmy Deenihan to mark the centenary of World War One.

“It recognises that thousands of men from the island of Ireland, north and south, died in the service of the British army in World War One,” she said.

“That sacrifice needs to be recognised.

“Here at Glasnevin from now on, we have a place where people can contemplate the heroism of those who gave their lives for our freedom.”

British Ambassador to Ireland Dominick Chillcot, Theresa Villiers, Jimmy Deenihan and Australian ambassador to Ireland Dr Ruth Adler
 
British Ambassador to Ireland Dominick Chillcot, Theresa Villiers, Jimmy Deenihan and Australian ambassador to Ireland Dr Ruth Adler attended the ceremony
 
 
Ceremony
 
The cross is being erected by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission, supported by the Irish government
 

A monumental Cross of Sacrifice is being erected on the site bythe Commonwealth War Graves Commission, with support from the Irish government, to mark the centenary of the First World War.

It will commemorate the sacrifice of all Irish soldiers who lost their lives in both world wars.

In recent years, as Anglo-Irish relations have markedly improved, there has been a growing acknowledgement in the Republic of Ireland of the contribution its citizens made fighting in the British army during the First World War – just before independence.

An official apology from the Irish government has also been issued to those thousands of soldiers who deserted its neutral forces during the Second World War to fight for Britain against Nazi Germany, and were effectively ostracised by the state on their return.

The latest event in Glasnevin forms part of a wider programme of ceremonies attended by UK and Irish m inisters to mark the war’s centenary and the associated decade of commemorations in Ireland, when events such as the 1916 Easter Rising in Dublin against British rule will also be marked.

Posted in Article | Comments Off on World War One memorial ceremony in Dublin

Jemmy Hope- The Shankill Revolutionary

Posted in Article | Comments Off on Jemmy Hope- The Shankill Revolutionary

Suzanne Wylie is appointed Chief Executive of new Belfast council

 

Belfast City Council’s Director of Health and Environmental Services Suzanne Wylie has been appointed as the Chief Executive of the new Belfast council that will come into operation on 1 April 2015.

The Belfast Statutory Transition Committee (STC) agreed the appointment today after a process administered by the Local Government Staff Commission of Northern Ireland.

Belfast City Council has never had a female chief executive.

Alderman Gavin Robinson, chairman of the STC, said: “Suzanne fully merits this appointment after coming through a testing and strenuous recruitment process during the past few weeks.

“We believe she is the right person to take the council into a new era and elected representatives are convinced we can work with her for the good of the city.

“It is an exciting time for the city and Suzanne, who has just completed 25 years’ service with the council. She has a wide range of experience across many of the council’s responsibilities, including environmental health, emergency planning, waste management and urban development.

“The current chief executive of Belfast City Council Peter McNaney will work closely with her during the next few months to ensure a seamless transition from the existing organisation to the new. We all wish Suzanne every success in her new post.”

Ms Wylie (48) expressed her delight at the appointment and said she was invigorated by the challenge ahead.

She said: “This is a time when the elected members, the officers and the various stakeholders of Belfast all need to work together for the good of the people of the city, the council and its employees.

“I have been responsible in recent years for a leading a number of partnerships aimed at making Belfast a safer, healthier, more vibrant and sustainable city. I am passionate about my home city of Belfast and am committed to dealing with some of our long-standing issues such as health inequalities and community cohesion.

“The months ahead will be extremely challenging as we prepare for the new powers and responsibilities that Local Government Reform will bring and the new areas that will come into our jurisdiction.

“But I am confident, given the high calibre of our elected members, our staff, the stakeholders and the people of Belfast, that we can successfully work together in partnership to meet the challenge and grow the city as a great place to invest, work, live and visit in the years ahead.”

There were 25 applicants – from a wide range of backgrounds, both locally and internationally – for the Chief Executive post.

 

Posted in Article | Comments Off on Suzanne Wylie is appointed Chief Executive of new Belfast council

The Appalachian Revolution

As the Scotch-Irish Cultural Revolution gains momentum in Appalachia, it is important to consider its intellectual epicentre, The College of William and Mary, in Williamsburg, Virginia. The college’s Williamite legacy pre-dates the formation of the Orange Order in Ireland .   Privately founded in 1693 by letters patent issued by King William III and Queen Mary II, The College of William and Mary is the second-oldest institution of higher education in the United States after Harvard University. William & Mary is considered one of the original “Public Ives”, a publicly funded university providing a quality of education comparable to those of the Ivy League.

William & Mary educated U.S. Presidents Thomas Jefferson, James Monroe, and John Tyler, as well as other key figures important to the development of America, including U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, Speaker of the House Henry Clay, and sixteen signers of the Declaration of Independence. W&M founded the Phi Beta Kappa academic honour society in 1776 and was the first school of higher education in the United States to install an honour code of conduct for students. The establishment of graduate programs in law and medicine in 1779 make it one of the first universities in the United States.

At the outset of the War between the States (1861–1865), enlistments in the Confederate Army depleted the student body and on May 10, 1861, the faculty voted to close the College for the duration of the conflict. The College building was used as a Confederate barracks and later as a hospital, first by Confederate, and later Union forces. The Battle of Williamburg was fought nearby during the Peninsula Campaign on May 5, 1862, and the city fell to the Union the next day. The Brafferton building of the College was used for a time as quarters for the commanding officer of the Union garrison occupying the town. On September 9, 1862, drunken soldiers of the 5th Pennsylvania Cavalry set fire to the College Building, purportedly in an attempt to prevent Confederate snipers from using it for cover. Much damage was done to the community during the Union occupation, which lasted until September 1865.

The ancient traditions of the British Realm under William and Mary of Orange have continued however within the ethos of the college..These are very ancient indeed. The House of Stewart or Stuart, from whom William and Mary and our present Queen Elizabeth II are ultimately descended, had its origins  in Alan fitz Flaald (born 1070, died in 1114)  Alan was of the Breton or Old British nobility and held the feudal barony and castle of  Oswestry in Shropshire, from which the family of William Wallace also came. Alan was descended from the ancient British who had fled to Armorica in France under the pressure of the invading Anglo-Saxons in the 5th century AD, transferring the name Little Britain to that area rather than  Ireland. His duties as a “valiant and illustrious man” included supervision of the Welsh border. Alan was the son of Flaald, who was in turn a son  of an Alain, a crusader (in 1097) who was dapifer to the Ancient Diocese of Dol in Dol-de Bretagne. The area of Dol which is near Mont-St-Michel and has figured in the history of the Kingdom and then Duchy of Brittany since at least the rule of Nominoe. “Alan, dapifer” is found as a witness in 1086 to a charter relating to Mezuoit, a cell of St. Florent, near Dol.

Flaald and his son Alan had come to the favourable notice of King Henry I of England who, soon after his accession, invited Alan to England with other Breton friends, and gave him forfeited lands in Norfolk and Shropshire, including some which had previously belonged to Ernulf de Hesdin and Robert de Belleme. Robert had proved a threat to Henry in both the Wesh Marches and in Normandy, so the king was determined to insert reliable supporters to counterbalance or replace his network of supporters. Alan received more land as he proved his worth. A large portfolio of lands in Shropshire and around Peppering, near Arundel in Sussex, was taken from the holdings of Rainald de Bailleul, ancestor of the House of Balliol, who were later to provide a king of Scotland.

The FitzAlan family quickly established themselves as a prominent Anglo-Norman noble house, with some of its members serving as High Sheriff of Shropshire. It was the great-grandson of Alan named Walter FitzAlan  who became the first hereditary High Steward of Scotland, while his brother William’s family would go on to become Earls of Arundel.The name Stewart derives from the political position of office similar to a governor, known as a steward. It was originally adopted as the family surname by Walter Stewart, 3rd High Sreward of Scotland, who was the third member of the family to hold the position. Prior to this, family names were not used, but instead they had patronyms defined through the father; for example the first two High Stewards were known as FitzAlan and FitzWalter respectively.

The sixth High Steward of Scotland, Walter Stewart (1293–1326), married Marjorie, daughter of Robert the Bruce, and also played an important part in the Battle of Bannockburn gaining further favour. Their son Robert was heir to the House of Bruce, the Lordship of Cunningham and the Bruce lands of Bourtreehill; he eventually inherited the Scottish throne when his uncle David II died childless in 1371.During the 16th century the French spelling Stuart was adopted by Mary, Queen of Scots  when she was living in France. She sanctioned the change to ensure the correct pronunciation of the Scots version of the name Stewart, because retaining the letter ‘w’ would have made it difficult for French speakers, who usually render “w” as “v”. The spelling Stuart was also used by her second husband, Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley; he was the father of James VI and I , so the spelling Stuart for the British royal family officially derives from him. Both Mary, Queen of Scots, and Lord Darnley had strong claims on the English throne, through their mutual grandmother, Margaret Tudor.

In total, nine Stewart monarchs ruled just Scotland from 1371 until 1603. After this there was a Union of the Crowns  under James VI and I who had become the senior genealogical claimant to The Crown holdings of the  ancient British House of Tudor.. Thus there were six Stewart monarchs who ruled both England and Scotland as well as Ireland (although the later Stuart era was interrupted by an interregnum lasting from 1649–1660, as a result of the Wars of the Three Kingdoms). Additionally, at the foundation of the Kingdom of Great Britain after the  Acts of Union, which officially united England and Scotland politically, the first monarch was Anne, Queen of Great Britain. After her death, all the holdings passed to the House of Hanover, under the terms of the Act of Settlement (1701).

During the reign of the Stewarts, Scotland developed from a relatively poor and feudal country into a prosperous, fairly modern and centralised state. They ruled during a time in European history of transition from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance. Monarchs such as James IV were known for sponsoring exponents of the Northern Renaissance such as the poet Robert Henryson and others, the great Makars of the Scots language, which we have inherited as Ullans or Ulster-Scots. After the Stewarts gained control of all of Great Britain, the arts and sciences continued to develop; many of William Shakespeare’s best known plays were authored during the Jacobean era, as was the Authorised version of the Bible, while institutions such as the Royal Society and Royal Mail were established during the reign of Charles II, Uncle of both William and Mary. During the reign of William and Mary,  the National Debt was commenced, the Bank of England established, the modern system of finance instituted, ministerial responsibility recognised, the standing army transferred to the control of parliament, the liberty of the press secured, and the British Constitution established on a firm basis.

One direct influence in the radical thinking which resulted from William’s reign was the work of the great Ulster philosopher Francis Hutcheson, son of an Armagh Presbyterian Minister, who was born probably at Drumalig, Saintfield, Co. Down, Ireland in 1694, and became the father of the Scottish Enlightenment. He was known on matriculation from the University of Glasgow as “Scoto-Hibernicus” or “Scotch-Irish”. His most important work is A Sense of Moral Philosophy (1755), about the right of resistance by a people in the event of betrayal of trust by government.  He expounded the doctrine of religious toleration and he deeply admired the tradition of armed militias for the protection of civil liberties.  These principles found their way via American Revolutionary thinkers into the Declaration of Independence and are embodied in the American Constitution. 

 
 
Posted in Article | Comments Off on The Appalachian Revolution